I found our discussion on Tuesday about the uncanny valley completely fascinating, and I've actually been thinking about it a lot. Obviously, I haven't spent near as much time on it as Dr. J, so I know there are things I'm not thinking through all the way, but I want to consider another possibility for the drop-off in the uncanny valley.
Of course, I think that attributing the valley to humans' fear of deception is quite apt. As I mentioned in class, it would be extremely unnerving to hear that your friend had actually been replaced by a robot double. This isn't because robots are inherently scary, but because no one wants to think that they were fooled so well that they couldn't even tell their friend had been replaced by an impostor. As robots become increasingly more human-esque, so does the fear that we'll no longer be able to tell who's a robot and who isn't.
As much as I like this theory, I feel like there's got to be something further. One idea that I've come up with is that humans feel threatened by robots in several different ways. First, there is the familiar sci-fi plot: in a futuristic world, robots have become a staple in everyday life, often with one present in the home to perform domestic chores. However, they've developed such higher thinking capabilities that they recognize their inferiority to humans, and thus turn and revolt upon mankind. This AI revolution has been present in so many entertainment mediums in the last few decades that I believe the public has a general idea of the (fictional?) prospective threat. The more advanced robotics becomes, the more this threat seems to encroach.
Aside from the more direct, aggressive threat proposed in a robot revolution, I think that humans are also afraid to lose their dominating, superior status in the world. We're already aware of the benefits that machines such as robots bring to industry, but as they're becoming more widespread they're being utilized in myriad other ways, from vacuuming rooms to performing surgery. While the idea of using robots to make production more effective or to perform menial tasks seems great at the outset, I believe that people can sense how much more the world is beginning to rely on machines. Of course, there is only one direction to go from there: instead of blaming Mexicans for taking all the jobs, people will eventually be blaming robots. As far as I see it, the less that humans are needed in order to accomplish something, the lower their value and status become in the world, while those of robots rise. When we have been on top for so long, we don't want to imagine a society in which we have a superior.
I know that this doesn't address the reason that the valley inclines again, but I thought this aspect was really interesting. Now that I've kinda geeked out, please tell me what you guys think of my idea, what's wrong with it, or what your own ideas are!
I like that idea and have not really realized that. We are fearful of losing our jobs or usefulness. I definitely think that it is one of the reason why the line valleys downward. Another thing that I had in my mind, even though completely off topic, is the corpse and disfigured humans. Like how a corpse is at the bottom right of the valley, I believe that the disfigured human should be there. Or if it is just me. I feel that we have certainly been sensitized to death, but we have not been sensitized to disfigurement. Just a thought, that it should be switched. Am I completely wrong, or what?
ReplyDeleteI think the concept you present is incredibly interesting - that humankind's aversion to robots stems from our fear of losing our dominant status. Although I'm not sure that this would result in a shift of blame, from immigrants to robots, as you suggest. I'm more inclined to think that it would simply result in a shift in the job market. We've already seen an increase in the demand for mechanics and engineers, with starting salaries for those with mechanical engineering degrees close to $60,000. I simply feel that the greater our reliance on machines is, the greater our need for engineers will be.
ReplyDeleteAlso, Phong, I don't think a disfigured human should be at the complete bottom of the valley. I agree that we've been sensitized to the presence of death through the media, since most news stories and many fictional shows focus on tragic and oftentimes gory deaths. Personally, however, I would be more horrified if I chanced upon a corpse than if I saw someone who'd been disfigured. But maybe I'm misunderstanding what it is you mean by disfiguration. I suppose we could just say that the very bottom of the valley should be reserved for the most disfigured corpses?
ReplyDeleteI agree that many of us want to be useful and many of us dislike deception, but who are you talking about when you say we? Are you suggesting that it is an universal fear? For instance, I am pretty sure that I think it be cool if someone made a robot double of me or someone I knew. It would be twice the fun. As long as the robot double served the same purpose, ought I care if the material is different than the original human it is based on? If that makes me a monster, so be it.
ReplyDelete